1. Manuscript Submission
Authors upload their complete manuscript packages via the secure JPES web portal, completing ethical checklists and parameter entries.
2. Initial Screening
The Editorial Office evaluates core tech scope alignment, template compliance, and runs comprehensive anti-plagiarism structural queries.
3. Editor Assignment
Manuscripts passing initial checks clear straight into a specialized domain Editor's dashboard for targeted supervision.
4. Double-Blind Peer Review
The appointed Editor delegates evaluation targets to 2–3 independent external doctorate-level experts specialized in the exact domain.
5. Evaluation Reporting
Reviewers deliver extensive technical statements scoring experimental depths, analytical accuracy, and append improvement parameters.
6. Consolidated Decision
The handling Editor synthesizes report weights and broadcasts a clear decision matrix letter containing critical revision paths.
7. Revision Tracking
Authors submit modified manuscripts which may undergo targeted verification checks to confirm absolute compliance with feedback notes.
8. Final Acceptance
Upon verifying absolute technological depth and guideline fulfillment, the Editor-in-Chief grants official paper acceptance.
9. Production & Proofs
Accepted scripts clear directly into professional typesetting, layout column framing, and metadata generation lines.
10. Volume Indexation
The paper deploys live online across unrestricted open-access databases, stamped with an independent unique DOI string.
Accept
Manuscript meets or exceeds all strict scientific quality metrics and ethical publication standards.
Minor Revision
Small contextual or citation updates required; processed rapidly through a direct desk check.
Major Revision
Significant structural or empirical corrections needed; requires formal re-review loops post submission.
Reject
Document displays fatal technical flaws, structural copy issues, or complete scope mismatches.
